In comparison to military institutions, law enforcement and intelligence institutions are arguably:

The assertion that law enforcement and intelligence institutions are more adept at keeping terrorists "on the run" relates to the unique tools and tactics these agencies employ. Unlike military forces, which may rely heavily on direct confrontation and destruction of physical targets, law enforcement and intelligence agencies focus on surveillance, gathering intelligence, and the use of strategic counter-terrorism methods that emphasize disruption rather than outright destruction.

Law enforcement agencies operate on a community level, utilizing information from local populations, and this can lead to more effective identification and apprehension of terrorist suspects. Intelligence agencies gather extensive data and analyze patterns, making it possible to anticipate movements and plans of terrorists, thus effectively keeping them on the defensive. These methods allow for continuous pressure on terrorist organizations, disrupting their operations and preventing coordinated attacks.

In contrast, military operations might achieve short-term victories but can inadvertently strengthen the resolve of terrorists and their local supporters, making the mission of keeping them "on the run" less effective in the long term.