What outcome is associated with violent coercion as a counterterrorist option?

The outcome associated with violent coercion as a counterterrorist option can often be categorized into specific deterrence against a specific adversary and demonstrations of national will.

Specific deterrence refers to the idea that by using significant force against a specific group or even individuals, it may prevent them and others from engaging in violent actions in the future. This outcome is achieved through fear of repercussions, effectively dissuading that particular adversary from committing future acts of terror.

Demonstrations of national will involve showing the resolve and strength of a nation in the face of terrorism. When a state employs violent measures against those who threaten its security, it signals to both domestic and international audiences that it will not tolerate such actions and is prepared to take decisive steps to maintain peace and security.

Together, these outcomes illustrate how violent coercion can function not only as a tactical maneuver against particular threats but also contribute to broader strategic objectives related to national security and public confidence. The combination of specific deterrence and national will serves to reinforce a country's commitment to combating terrorism.