Which of the following is a possible policy option to combat the New Terrorism?

The selected answer highlights the importance of conciliatory options and their potential effectiveness in combating New Terrorism. This approach often involves diplomatic engagement, negotiation, or compromise aimed at addressing the underlying grievances that lead individuals or groups to support or engage in terrorist activities. By addressing these root causes, governments and organizations can potentially reduce the appeal of extremist ideologies and foster a more peaceful atmosphere, which might discourage terrorism in the long run.

This strategy recognizes that not all individuals drawn to terrorism are irredeemable and that fostering dialogue can lead to peace and stability. It can also help build community resilience against extremist narratives by promoting understanding and cooperation among diverse groups.

In contrast, other approaches, such as the use of nuclear weapons or declarations of war, typically escalate conflict and can cause significant collateral damage, often further fueling resentment and radicalization among affected populations. Similarly, a strategy focused solely on eliminating extremists for each person killed risks creating a cycle of violence that may not address the broader issues leading to terrorism. Conciliation stands out as a more proactive and potentially sustainable long-term strategy in addressing the complexities of New Terrorism.